![]() ![]() ![]() So too will Assassin’s Creed III be judged.Īnd that is unfair. ![]() It is quite like The Dark Knight Rises, a movie that was expertly made and handled in its own right, but doomed to forever be unfavorably compared with its predecessor. It is not the leap over II that II was over the first one, it lacks the same monumental impact that II had, and in every way possible, it stays in II’s shadow. If you were expecting it to be, you set yourself up for disappointment. Therefore, that is my longwinded way of saying that no, Assassin’s Creed III is not better than II. Its direct follow ups, Brotherhood and Revelations, were great games in their own right, but never again will gaming probably have a revelation on par with what Assassin’s Creed II was. It was a game that expanded on the original’s concept, premise, and potential, a game that addressed the flaws of the original, a game that simultaneously, while redeeming the series, also irrevocably moved it forwards. It was a game that achieved everything that it set out to do, and more. Assassin’s Creed II, the sequel to a highly atmospheric game rooted in one of the best concepts in modern gaming, but one that fell flat somewhat, was borderline perfection. This needs to be understood at the outset, this needs to be made clear before you delve into this game. Assassin’s Creed III is not Assassin’s Creed II. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |